[War_ooc] Okay, so...

[lee.tarnow at utoronto.ca]

Fair enough.

I don't think that goes far enough though -- there would still need to  
be deliberation of whether or not it would work or not.

I was thinking more or less along the lines of rating the countries  
fiscal, legal, and political leverages on a, say, 10 point scale, and  
then deliberate if the actions are within the realm of possibility  
that way. As an example, we could say that if (0 being left, 10 being  
right) Canada as a country was a 5 on the political spectrum, governed  
by a 6 government, implementing an 8 policy would be plain  
highly-unlikely, whereby a 7 might seem fair. It would then come down  
to defining how we determine where the policies lie (ie John's job).

I think that makes sense?

Quoting Michael Downey <michael.michaeldowney at gmail.com>:

> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 6:25 PM, <lee.tarnow at utoronto.ca> wrote:
>> Again, we don't have to codify everything, but why not codify some
>> things so we don't have to get bogged down in it later?'
>
> I thought the three criteria I listed were a good (but not perfect,
> needs to be expanded) start.
>
> _______________________________________________
> War_ooc mailing list
> War_ooc at esteroic.com
> http://esteroic.com/mailman/listinfo/war_ooc_esteroic.com
>