[War_ooc] Thoughts on WAR

[Dylan de Valk]

then why not just have 4 GM's?  im mean really, it doesnt matter what way we
do this.  what matters is that everything is done fairly and on time.
Whether it takes 2,3, or 4 GM's doesn't matter.  right now, i think 3 sounds
good.  if things dont work out, we'll change it.  big woop.

On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 4:39 PM, <Chazenesq2b at aol.com> wrote:

>  I don't see how it would be too top heavy.  We have 12 players now, and I
> don't see how an 'AGM' is a leadership position when they need to report to
> the GMs in turn.
>
> More over, although World Reports can be fun to write, we have had problems
> in the past with people abusing their authority... GMs going at each other,
> etc.  A discipline AGM would be a great way to let all concerned parties
> have their worries mediated.  If you're worried about being pidgeon holed
> into one category, just have the AGMs and GMs revolve.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews
> on AOL Autos<http://autos.aol.com/cars-BMW-128-2008/expert-review?ncid=aolaut00050000000017>
> .
>
> _______________________________________________
> War_ooc mailing list
> War_ooc at esteroic.com
> http://esteroic.com/mailman/listinfo/war_ooc_esteroic.com
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://esteroic.com/pipermail/war_ooc_esteroic.com/attachments/20080812/8f14829b/attachment.html