[War_ooc] Thoughts on WAR

[pbuck11 at aol.com]

I have to concur while on paper its a great idea we don't need a discpline agm at this time. If we had 20 fokls or so it woukd be a good idea.
------Original Message------
From: John Penta
Sender: 
To: war_ooc at esteroic.com
ReplyTo: war_ooc at esteroic.com
Sent: Aug 12, 2008 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: [War_ooc] Thoughts on WAR

It -does- seem top-heavy, personally - 1/3 of the game in leadership
positions. I'd also rather we had more flexibility - there are
certainly some weeks I'd like the opportunity to not think about the
newbies and just focus on the WR (which is, despite our bitching,
kinda fun to write), and I wonder how many arguments there really are
for a discipline AGM to settle.

On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Michael Downey
<michael.michaeldowney at gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't really see the big difference of having four players as the
> administration as being any more top heavy than three. I actually
> think it would be more efficient, with the labor of doing the WR and
> running the game more diffused.
>
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Daniel Sanderson
> <dantheman2210 at yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>> Well, none of this bothers me all that much, I just do my writing and generally don't have any problems. My main worry would be that we become top-heavy, with 50% of the players holding leadership positions etc.

_______________________________________________
War_ooc mailing list
War_ooc at esteroic.com
http://esteroic.com/mailman/listinfo/war_ooc_esteroic.com


Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry