[War_ooc] Some discussions we need to have, right now

[Dan Garcia]

> That being said, we need to keep the WR, as is I think.  I know, I was  all 
> for abandoning it, but I honestly don't see any other way of evaluating  
> actions.  This being said, I don't think we need things to be as detailed  as we 
> normally are.  Any elaboration can be made OOC as to what the GM's  intentions 
> were.

I really only have one comment, which is getting things OOC from the GMs needs to be OOC from
*all* the GMs, so that we don't go all Fort Sumter and all.  :)  That's perhaps the one major
benefit of the WR:  it's something that all the GMs sign off on and (perhaps grudgingly :) ) agree
to as game canon, and it's written (electronically) down for all to see.

Danny