<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16643" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=role_body style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"
bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 topMargin=7 rightMargin=7><FONT id=role_document
face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV>"Capitalizing"</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>President Xia Hong</DIV>
<DIV>The People's Republic of China</DIV>
<DIV>June 22, 2014</DIV>
<DIV>================================================</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>By now it was no secret to the Ministers of China's government that there
was a bit of tit-for-tat going on in the Americas. News Agencies were
always a good source of basic intelligence, and news broadcasts from Canada as
well as the States were covering, as Xinhua was, the growing 'NAFTA Rift'.
It was only a matter of time before one of the major trading partners became
unhappy with the deal... she did 'not' see it being Canada though, that was a
bit of a surprise.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>This being said, it certainly wasn't an unwelcomed one. China and
Canada shared trading before. Canadian high-technology and raw materials
was always a great commodity for China, and likewise cheap Chinese goods kept
Canadian manufacturers in business, and kept Canadian citizens happy and well
stocked. It was an equal trading partnership between two, economically
well positioned companies. Now with the US threatening litigation, it was
a good time to seek to strengthen the mutually beneficial partnership.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>FROM: Office of the President- Executive Residence, People's Republic
of China</DIV>
<DIV>TO: Office of the Prime Minister- Canada</DIV>
<DIV>CC: Office of the Ambassador: Embassy of Canada, Beijing;
Parliament of Canada, </DIV>
<DIV>RE: Matters of Mutual Concern</DIV>
<DIV>EC: STD Beijing-Ottawa Protocol</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Dear Prime Minister, Ambassador, and Honored Members of Parliament:</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Recent events have shined light on matters of mutual concern for Canada and
the People's Republic. This communique is intended to discuss several such
matters, and should by no means be considered as a sole source of matters of
interest to the People's Republic of China. Should your government, at any
time, wish to expand upon the bases set forth in this letter, we invite Canadian
input on all matters and stand ready to discuss all subjects openly.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>First, of the most immediate importance, your Government through NATO will
undoubtedly be soon hearing of China's commitment to possible military actions
against Iran. Should it be necessary to engage in warfare, please be
assured all precautions will be taken to eliminate any possible hazards to
Canadian troops from the armed forces of the People's Republic. This
effort would be greatly enhanced by the inclusion of Chinese advisors with NATO
planners, but to date such inquiries to the United States have only yielded
negative results. You can expect to be fully informed of China's
activities, should an invasion appear imminent. Canadian advisors and
observers are absolutely welcomed to join Chinese units, should the Prime
Minister feel such actions beneficial. Our respective Ministries of
Defense can undoubtedly make satisfactory agreements in this regard should you
be interested. Any and all advice Canada may wish to offer, or any and all
concerns the Prime Minister may retain with regards to Iran, are
welcomed.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Secondly, as reported in major news outlets, we are aware of your recent
economic disagreement with the United States of America. President
Williams has in the past caused a great deal of consternation for the People's
Republic in regards to economic factors, leading to the arrest and subsequent
conviction of American agents within China, spying apparently for the economic
benefit of the United States. Litigation to solve problems that China
feels better resolved through diplomacy and negotiation, is apparently a favored
tactic of the United States. We hope the Prime Minister and the Canadian
Government does not lose much sleep over this latest display of American
economic belligerence. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Likewise, allow me this opportunity to highlight recent work with your
Government. The previous administration was very fair in it's trading
practices with China, as can be demonstrated by the recent purchase by China of
CANDU nuclear reactors and continued exchanges of manufactured products.
The People's Republic considers Canada an important trading partner, who's
concerns must be held equal to any other country's. This said, I would
like to take this opportunity to extend to you an invitation for discussions
regarding setting a framework for fair economic relations between our
nations. Access to Canadian goods will be of great advantage to China, and
likewise we feel that an improved flow of Chinese goods into Canada will be of
benefit to Canada's citizens who continue to face rising prices of common
items. Particularly, the People's Republic is interested in acquiring
access to Canada's green technologies industry, as environmental concerns are
given the highest domestic priority. It is a known fact that Canada is a
global leader in this field.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Finally, military matters aside from a possible pending Iranian action must
be considered. In this regard, China would like to make formal inquiries
regarding the possibility of joint military exercises. The Pearson Center
for Peacekeeping is a renown global authority on the subject, and the PLA's
strategic planners have come to see stabilization and peacekeeping operations as
a growing theater of concern. We believe Canada, as a respected
international peacekeeping contributor, can provide much in the way of new
lessons for our troops committed to operations in North Korea, and possibly
Iran. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Canada's recent interest in military expansion is a source of confusion for
China. China understands and certainly respects Canada's right
to defend itself, and recognizes the need for a modern, flexible fighting force
to do so. The scope of these advances raises legitimate questions over
Canada's intentions though, and should it please the Prime Minister, China will
await further clarification from the Prime Minister.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>The People's Republic respectfully requests an audience with the Prime
Minister or other appointed member of government at his convenience to establish
a formal dialogue on these matters, and more.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Sincerely,</DIV>
<DIV>Xia Hong- President of The People's Republic of China</DIV>
<DIV>======================================================================</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>ACTIONS</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>1. Send Correspondence to Canada :-D</DIV></FONT><BR><BR><BR><DIV><FONT style="color: black; font: normal 10pt ARIAL, SAN-SERIF;"><HR style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px">Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient <A title="http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007" href="http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007" target="_blank">used cars</A>.</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>