[War] Fwd: RE: WAR's situation (was: Re: NHSAC: Waiting on Game Reports - December 2006)

[Vampi Digitalwytch]

Hmmm...interesting and workable.  I've been rereading World War Z for
the umpteenth time and it is possible to move things ahead of current
events while still keeping them grounded if that makes sense.

Case in point from the book, the rising of the zombies starts after
Iraq's been settled and we're already with the next president, but
other than those events, nothing's different from now.  Things are
kept vague other than knowing they're over and it was mixed opinion on
how it was handled.


> I also agree with John about the 201X future date, and how we should
> let the players decide the immediate future of their nation, with some
> guidelines from the GMs. As for the rest of the world, the GMs and
> others could sit down and hammer out a two or three page 'Recent
> History' report that outlines the current status of WARWorld and how
> it came to be.

-- 
--I know there are no lifeguards in the gene pool, but damn, there
ought to be at least a few sharks in the water.