[War] US: Madam Speaker?
pentaj2 at Scranton.edu
pentaj2 at Scranton.edu
Thu Nov 16 14:55:49 EST 2006
"Madam Speaker?"
16 November 2006
Pres. John Williams
USA
===============
POTUS sat in the Residence, in one of the solariums on the third
floor; He'd taken some of the mail that came through the secretaries
up with him after the morning briefings earlier, and had just sat down
to open it up and read it.
A head poked in. Jarrett Walker, his personal aide (called a "bodyman"
colloquially).
"They'll be here in 10, sir. May want to start getting ready for em."
"Thanks, Jarrett."
With that, Jarrett gathered up the mail for later, and the President
headed downstairs.
10 minutes later, the House Democratic leadership - as it was going to
be constituted for 2007, anyway, and at least the senior few people -
entered the White House, greeted by the President and the White House
press corps.
"Hi, and welcome to the White House!" greeted the President with a
grin. "Don't worry, we fed the reporters before you came, they
shouldn't bite."
Laughter at that, as POTUS shook hands and the cameras were fed.
"Alright, folks. You're all finally here. Let's head upstairs and
chat, shall we?"
With that, POTUS turned and led the group to the stairs, the Speaker-
to-be beside him; amiable filler chatter ensued until they left the
reach of the press.
"So, are we actually going to see bipartisanship, Mr. President?"
asked Pelosi.
Williams smiled. "I was bipartisan in the House, and my essential
nature has not changed, Madam Speaker."
"I'll believe it when I see it, Mr. President," noted Steny Hoyer, the
Majority Leader. "This place does weird things to people, and you
haven't had to really deal with Congress since you moved down here."
Williams nodded. "Fair enough; And, agreed. I hope you all would be
good enough to smack me privately if I somehow let this job go to my
head."
A chorus of "Deal!" followed as they reached the third floor, and the
President led the group into the solarium. Gizmo, being himself, had
decided to steal the President's chair as a good place for a nap.
"Gizmo, get down from there. No stealing my chair!" scolded John with
a grin.
The dog looked up at its owner with sad eyes. ~Do I have to?~ he
seemed to be asking.
"Get *down* from there," Williams repeated calmly and sternly.
The dog whined as he returned to the floor, deciding that curling up
*on* the POTUS's feet would be a good revenge.
John looked to the Democrats, then. "Yeah. Among the things we really
need to do is renovate and remodel the Residence. Make it kid-proof
and prep for the baby, obviously, but also," he noted with a grin as
he pointed at the Wheaten Terrier on his feet, "make it dog proof."
Laughter from everybody as they sat down, coffee and trimmings set out
for them by the stewards.
"Mr. President, I sense I'll need to drag the appropriations committee
down here to talk with you and the First Lady about that?" replied
Speaker Pelosi with a grin.
"Yeah. Now, before we get down to business, I have a minor proposal
for you," Williams replied, as he passed out papers.
"On what?"
"Minimum wage." He paused. "I'll give you the raise to $7.25 you've
proposed, but."
There was a pause as they all *looked* at him. Had he really just
*given* them that? And what was the 'but'?
"But," Williams continued, "in return, we find a way to index it to
inflation. Maybe CPI will do that, maybe we need a new metric. Either
way, this should be the last time it has to be fought over. Index it
to -price inflation-, and let's quit using it as a football."
Thoughtfulness on Democratic faces, Pelosi's not least.
"Why price inflation?" She asked.
"If it tracked wage inflation, it would seem to spur a vicious circle
of inflationary pressures, as I recall from my economics courses in
college," Williams noted. "Indexing to price inflation preserves
buying power, without risking a boom-and-bust effect as the economy
goes."
Nods from everyone.
"Now, where would you all like to begin?" Williams asked.
"Iraq," Pelosi replied.
"I meet with the new Saudi King soon, and it'll be on the table. I'm
going to see what help he can provide in helping us get through this,"
Williams replied. "After that, I'll want to meet with you and the rest
of the Gang of Eight, plus Chair and Ranking Member on HASC and SASC,
to discuss matters. My *goal* is to get the troops out by 1 January
2008. I hope I'm not being optimistic."
"You aren't the only one, Mr. President."
"Next...Committee Assignments. I won't argue on any, I don't really
*care* who you put on what committee. With one exception," Williams
noted, with a pause.
"Intelligence," Pelosi replied.
Williams nodded. "Bingo. Madam Speaker...I realize you might not like
Jane Harman, but let me be really, really honest. Alcee Hastings was
impeached for taking bribes by a Democratic House, with your vote
among those in the affirmative as I recall, and convicted by a
Democratic Senate. The man could never recieve a security clearance.
He is therefore utterly inappropriate for a committee that works with
classified information. Am I going to tell you 'don't appoint him as
chair'? No. It's your prerogative, and I fully respect that. But how
the hell can we expect *anybody* to respect security protocols when we
let someone impeached for taking payoffs chair a committee that deals
in the most sensitive information held by the US government? If I
don't scream, loudly and continuously, against his appointment as
chair, I'm a hypocrite. We're *all* hypocrites. If you appoint him,
I'm telling you now that I will not be silent. I will scream very,
very loudly."
A silence settled over the room, then.
"I'll think about what you've said, Mr. President. I didn't realize
you had such strong opinions on the matter," Pelosi responded,
uncertainly.
"Next up...Let's run down the biggest social issues," Williams nudged
the convo.
"I know what the Democratic caucus thinks, I want to tell you what *I*
think, given I've held my thoughts to myself mostly," he continued.
"On abortion: I'm a loyal Catholic. Abortion is bad. However, I'm also
of the belief that, regardless of that fact, on such issues there's
every reason to wait until there's a popular consensus on the issue.
If I have to appoint judges, there'll be no litmus tests beyond: A. Is
this person qualified? B. Is their record with regards to ethics of
the unsullied quality the people have a right to expect from the
judicial branch? C. Will they rule on the case at hand, not try to
make philosophical points?
"If they wind up being conservative, OK. If they wind up being
liberal, OK. I just prefer judges who can be modest; Rule on the case,
respecting precedent to the extent you can. If that means a decision
is made to overturn Roe v Wade, so be it.
"When it comes to Supreme Court justices, same rules apply. John
Roberts has the right idea: Rule narrowly, trying not to make new
philosophical points or overturn precedent unless you have to.
"Gay marriage: It isn't a federal issue. There'll be no constitutional
amendments being proposed by me, I'll say that. I disagree with it for
the simple reason that I figure if you want something -like- marriage
for homosexuals, something that gives the same basic protections,
that's OK...But don't call it marriage, because that violates the
commonly-understood meaning of the term. Right now...The states will
decide as the states will decide. Eventually, every state will have to
deal with the issue. When that happens, inevitably conflicts of law
come up, which it will be the Congress's task to deal with, one way or
the other. But otherwise, we do not touch the issue. Not even in
regards to federal recognition of civil unions. Not until there's a
clear consensus. So, please. Even if it might please the base to bring
it up, don't. I believe in the rectification of names on this point:
If you call something by a name, it should accord with what that
something means."
Sighs of relief could be heard. "I don't think I need to say, Mr.
President, that it'll be good to have that issue left off the table
around here," Hoyer said.
"Agreed," Williams noted.
"Now, the economy. I am a free trader. You all know that, we've worked
together in the past on a lot of things. Yes, globalization hurts at
times. I sympathize with those representing states that get beaten up
by the loss of manufacturing jobs...But the country, as a whole, wins
with free trade.
"On the budget? We balance it. Maybe not immediately, but we balance
it. Primarily, we get systems to work *better*. We cut things, the
stupid things everybody knows should be cut but doesn't want to face
the whining on. I'm thinking of a lot of the pork we dole out. The
farm bill. The random earmarks we spread everywhere."
"What about immigration?" asked Pelosi.
"Count me as a supporter of comprehensive reform. At the same time,
though, we should build an actual border fence, to the extent the
environment allows," Williams replied.
"You all might disagree with me on a lot of things, but that's fine. I
want to make it clear where I stand as we start to talk about things.
"Which is what today's about."
The day continued like that; A long, roaming discussion that went on
for hours on end.
At the end of the day was dinner, the House Democratic leadership and
the White House staff all around the same table.
"May the next two years be as reasonable as today was," offered POTUS.
---
Actions:
1. Meet with House Democrats.
2. Offer carrot: Agreement on Minimum wage to $7.25, in return for
indexing it to some form of prince inflation measurement, so that the
issue is no longer an issue.
3. Offer stick: Madam Speaker, swallow your pride. Don't put Alcee
Hastings as chair of the intelligence committee. If you don't, I will
scream long and loud about you putting an impeached federal judge in a
position with access to the most sensitive of classified information.
4. A general "this is where I stand" run-through of issues, followed
by a day of friendly discussion, debate, and general "getting-to-know-
each-other".
5. Follow up the next day with a meeting with the Senate Democratic
leadership, covering the same basic issues.
More information about the War
mailing list