[War] Status
pentaj2 at Scranton.edu
pentaj2 at Scranton.edu
Sat Jul 8 10:44:32 EDT 2006
----- Original Message -----
From: Patrick B <pbuck11 at aol.com>
Date: Saturday, July 8, 2006 1:55 am
Subject: Re: [War] Status
> Also, I'm reminded of an old saying from Charlie Beckworth, It's
> better
> to go up the river with 10 studs then 100 shitheads. WAR should
> not be
> about size, it shouldn't be oooh we have 165 countries filled, it
> should
> be about the quality of the writer, about the maturity of the
> writer,
> and if we have to be selective bastards let's be selective.
Completely *aside* of the realism debate...
OK, I agree with this in general terms, but there's an issue of
critical mass.
The last few years have impressed upon me that WAR needs a minimum
number of people active, about 8-10, so that we have enough of
an 'idea gene pool' to work with. Higher than you might have thought?
Yeah. But we tend to have...issues with less than 8 people.
Just a thought.
John
More information about the War
mailing list